Review State-Mandated Health Benefits
State-mandated health benefits impose special interest group preferences on every medical consumer. They can also
increase medical insurance costs.
Arkansas individuals, families and providers should not be required to pay for state-mandated health benefits they do
not use or want.
Examples of state-mandated health benefits include treatment for hair transplants, acupuncture, podiatry, and
alternative health practices like naturopathy and osteopathy.
According to StateHealthFacts.org, a project of the Kaiser Family Foundation, all 50 states including Arkansas require
private insurers to cover treatment for various services.
One scholarly article found the "average number of mandated benefit laws enacted per year was one per year between
1949 and 1969, 17 per year in the 1970s, and 37 per year in the 1980s, rising to 57 per year by the 1990s."
The authors concluded, "There was a large increase in the number of mandated benefits laws during the managed care
"backlash" of the 1990s. Many states now use mandated benefits to prescribe not only what services and benefits would
be provided but how, where, and when services will be provided."
"A Comparative Analysis of Mandated Benefit Laws, 1949–2002"
Miriam J Laugesen, Rebecca R Paul, Harold S Luft, Wade Aubry, and Theodore G Ganiats
Health Services Research 2006 June; 41(3 Pt 2): 1081–1103.
State-mandated health benefits in Arkansas should be reviewed. Certain mandates should be ended or
reduced in terms of the dollar amount of coverage.
|
Arkansas Policy Blog
Click here to view the Arkansas Policy Blog.
Peer-Reviewed Research
The Arkansas Policy Foundation is an educational organization that regularly submits its research to scholarly journals that use a peer
review process.
Journal Publications
'Regulation of financial derivatives in the U.S. code'
Derivatives Use, Trading and Regulation
(London, U.K.) Palgrave Macmillian Ltd.
February 2006
Read Online
'Deflation & Economic Growth'
QJAE
(Piscataway, N.J.) Transaction Periodicals Consortium, Rutgers University
Summer 2006
Policy Foundation research on this topic cited by Arkansas Attorney General Mike Beebe
(Opinion No. 2005-291)
'A review of state statutes regulating financial derivatives in the USA'
Pensions, an International Journal
(London, U.K.) Palgrave Macmillian Ltd.
2004
Read Online
|